Skip to content

AfD slams CSU for backing progressive judicial nominee in ideological shift

A bitter feud erupts as the AfD brands the CSU's judicial backing a surrender to left-wing ideology. Will this fracture Germany's conservative opposition?

The image shows an old map of Germany from the 19th century, depicting the political divisions of...
The image shows an old map of Germany from the 19th century, depicting the political divisions of the region. The map is printed on a paper with text at the top and bottom, providing further details about the region's political divisions.

AfD slams CSU for backing progressive judicial nominee in ideological shift

The AfD has criticised the CSU for backing a controversial judicial nominee, calling it a betrayal of conservative values. Stephan Brandner, the party's deputy federal spokesperson, accused the CDU/CSU of abandoning its principles to maintain opposition unity. The dispute centres on Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf, an SPD-nominated jurist with strongly progressive views.

Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf has drawn sharp criticism for her stance on abortion rights and her rejection of legal protections for the unborn. Despite this, Alexander Hoffmann, leader of the CSU's state parliamentary group, has publicly supported her nomination to the Federal Constitutional Court.

Brandner expressed surprise at the CSU's shift, noting that the CDU and CSU had previously resisted Brosius-Gersdorf's candidacy. He claimed the party's backing now aligns with 'ultra-left' positions rather than traditional Christian Democratic values. The CDU/CSU has a history of pushing conservative candidates for the court, even when contentious. In 2023 and 2024, they proposed Hans-Georg Maaßen, though the SPD, Greens, and FDP blocked him. Earlier, in 2021, they successfully appointed Christian Waldhoff, another conservative jurist. Past nominations, such as Andreas Voßkuhle's replacements and the scandal-hit Thomas Harbarth in 2014, also reflected this pattern. Brandner argued that the CDU/CSU's latest move suggests a willingness to compromise core beliefs for political convenience.

The CSU's support for Brosius-Gersdorf marks a break from its usual approach of prioritising ideological alignment in judicial appointments. The decision has sparked debate over whether the party is softening its stance to secure broader opposition agreements. The outcome of the nomination process remains uncertain.

Read also:

Latest