Skip to content

AfD’s Weidel slams Germany’s passive role in Ukraine peace efforts

A fierce debate erupts as Germany’s far-right demands a shift from arms to diplomacy. Could Berlin’s stance prolong the war—or end it?

This is book.
This is book.

AfD’s Weidel slams Germany’s passive role in Ukraine peace efforts

Alice Weidel, co-leader of the Alternative for Germany (AfD), has criticised Europe’s role in the Ukraine war. She claims the continent has been sidelined in US-led peace talks. Her comments come as the party pushes for stronger diplomatic efforts to end the fighting.

The AfD has long called for negotiations to stop the war in Ukraine. Weidel argues that Germany could have played a key part in peace talks if it had acted as a neutral mediator. Instead, she accuses the government of escalating tensions with aggressive rhetoric.

The German government maintains its support for Ukraine’s defence and sovereignty. It continues to provide military and financial aid while backing multilateral diplomatic efforts. Officials stress that any lasting peace depends on Russia’s willingness to engage in serious negotiations.

Berlin has made clear it does not intend to lead peace talks alone. Its focus remains on strengthening Ukraine’s position and working within international frameworks. The government insists its approach balances defence support with diplomatic engagement.

Weidel’s remarks highlight a divide over Germany’s stance on the war. The AfD demands direct diplomatic intervention, while the government prioritises backing Ukraine and multilateral solutions. The debate reflects broader disagreements on how to achieve a resolution in the conflict.

Read also:

Latest