Skip to content

Bangladesh opposition warns democracy at risk ahead of February elections

Ahead of February’s vote, a top opposition figure accuses the government of silencing dissent. Can Bangladesh’s democracy survive without free press and fair debate?

In this image in the center there is one news paper, and some text is written in that newspaper.
In this image in the center there is one news paper, and some text is written in that newspaper.

Bangladesh opposition warns democracy at risk ahead of February elections

Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir, secretary general of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), has raised concerns about threats to democracy and press freedom in Bangladesh. Speaking ahead of the upcoming elections, he criticized the current state of media independence and the spread of misinformation on social media platforms.

Fakhrul highlighted the role of social media in disrupting democratic progress. He warned that false propaganda and unchecked online campaigns are targeting political leaders, public figures, and businesspeople. According to him, differing opinions in the country are often met with hostility rather than open debate.

He called on journalist organizations to stand firm in defending their rights. Instead of aligning with political parties, he urged them to demand better working conditions and resist pressure from media owners and the government. His remarks also referenced the BNP’s 31-point plan, which includes guarantees for full media freedom.

Reflecting on Bangladesh’s political history, Fakhrul praised former leaders Ziaur Rahman and Khaleda Zia. He credited them with advancing multi-party democracy and protecting media independence. Despite his optimism about the upcoming elections, he stressed that true democracy cannot exist without freedom of expression.

The BNP leader’s comments come as the country prepares for February’s vote. His calls for stronger press rights and accountability on social media point to ongoing challenges in Bangladesh’s political landscape. The election outcome may determine whether these concerns lead to concrete changes in media and democratic freedoms.

Read also:

Latest