Bangladesh’s Controversial Charter Sparks Outrage Over Undemocratic Process
A new constitutional proposal in Bangladesh has drawn sharp criticism for its undemocratic approach and vague promises. The National Consensus Commission’s July Charter, drafted without public input, claims to promote equality and justice but leaves key issues unaddressed. Critics argue it fails to tackle systemic fascism, inequality, and the legal foundations of authoritarian rule in the country. The July Charter was put together by an elite group with no recorded public consultation. Instead of addressing long-standing problems, it treats fascism as a recent issue tied to Sheikh Hasina’s leadership or the Awami League. The document ignores how the 1973 Second Amendment and the 1974 Special Powers Act (SPA) have enabled state repression for decades. The July Charter’s passage would leave Bangladesh’s authoritarian structures intact. Citizens will have no legal way to challenge its provisions, and the vote’s all-or-nothing format blocks meaningful debate. Without repealing repressive laws or addressing systemic injustices, the Charter risks deepening the very problems it claims to solve.
Read also:
- American teenagers taking up farming roles previously filled by immigrants, a concept revisited from 1965's labor market shift.
- Weekly affairs in the German Federal Parliament (Bundestag)
- Landslide claims seven lives, injures six individuals while they work to restore a water channel in the northern region of Pakistan
- Escalating conflict in Sudan has prompted the United Nations to announce a critical gender crisis, highlighting the disproportionate impact of the ongoing violence on women and girls.
