Skip to content

Berlin court rules police wrongfully banned Palestine Congress in 2024

A landmark ruling challenges Germany’s heavy-handed policing of Palestine solidarity. But will it change the state’s approach to free speech—and who gets to define the limits?

In this image we can see people are protesting on the road. In the background, we can see...
In this image we can see people are protesting on the road. In the background, we can see buildings, pole and a tree. At the top of the image, we can see the sky. On the left side of the image, we can see a car and a bicycle.

Berlin court rules police wrongfully banned Palestine Congress in 2024

A Berlin court has ruled that police unlawfully shut down the Palestine Congress in April 2024. The decision highlights a broader pattern of suppression targeting pro-Palestinian activism across Germany. Critics argue the government has systematically silenced dissent since the outbreak of the Gaza war.

The Berlin administrative court found that authorities failed to consider milder alternatives before banning the event. Instead, police moved directly to a full shutdown, a measure the court deemed disproportionate. The ruling does not, however, prevent law enforcement from continuing to regulate what forms of Palestine solidarity or criticism of Israel remain permissible.

Since October 2023, German officials have aggressively policed debates on Palestine and Israel. Dissenting voices face swift accusations of antisemitism, often leading to criminalisation. The Federal Interior Ministry has constructed legal justifications to justify crackdowns, shielding the state’s political consensus from scrutiny.

Hundreds of legal challenges are now pending in German courts, with activists and organisers contesting violations of free expression. The government’s approach extends beyond bans, employing preemptive censorship to control public discourse on the issue.

The court’s decision exposes flaws in the state’s handling of pro-Palestinian events. Yet the ruling leaves significant discretion in the hands of police to define acceptable speech. For now, the legal battles continue, with activists pushing back against what they describe as a systematic erosion of democratic freedoms.

Read also:

Latest