Skip to content

Berlin's Controversial Apprenticeship Levy Sparks Backlash from Startups

A bold move to boost vocational training divides Berlin's business world. Founders warn the policy ignores modern workforce realities—will it work?

The image shows an open book with the title "Mechanic Institution, for the Advantage of Masters,...
The image shows an open book with the title "Mechanic Institution, for the Advantage of Masters, Journeymen, and Apprenticeships" written on it. The book is likely a proposal for establishing a mechanical institution, as indicated by the title.

Berlin's Controversial Apprenticeship Levy Sparks Backlash from Startups

Berlin has introduced a new training levy that will penalise companies failing to offer enough apprenticeships. The rule, approved by the House of Representatives, targets businesses with at least ten employees. From 2028, those not meeting a 4.6 percent training quota will have to pay into a central fund expected to raise around €75 million each year.

Criticism has already emerged from local startups, who argue the policy misses the mark on modern workforce needs.

The levy was passed to push more companies into providing apprenticeships. Currently, Berlin's training quota sits at about 3.1 percent, matching the national average. Officials hope the new rule will lift that figure by forcing firms to either train or contribute financially.

Under the scheme, any business with ten or more staff must ensure at least 4.6 percent of their workforce are apprentices by 2028. Those falling short will pay into a fund, which the city estimates will generate €75 million annually. The money will support training programmes across Berlin. Reactions from the business community have been sharply critical. Ralph Hage, founder of Lap Coffee, called the levy a 'misguided signal' that fails to address real challenges. His company focuses on automation and digital training, making traditional apprenticeships a poor fit. Marius Meiners of Peec AI echoed this, describing the rule as another barrier for startups in an already difficult environment. Moritz Kreppel, founder of Urban Sports Club, argued that the policy unfairly punishes companies for not offering outdated training models. Agnieszka Walorska of Mika fintech pointed to a broader issue: young people's declining interest in traditional apprenticeships, rather than a lack of willingness from employers. Both founders stressed that the levy does little to solve the root problem.

The training levy will take effect in 2028, giving companies time to adjust their hiring or prepare for payments. Berlin expects the fund to boost apprenticeship opportunities, though critics claim it adds unnecessary pressure on businesses. The policy's success will depend on whether it increases training places or simply shifts costs onto employers.

Read also:

Latest