Skip to content

CDU’s Spahn clashes with Steinmeier over potential AfD party ban in Germany

A fiery debate divides Germany’s leadership: Should democracy fight extremism with bans or ballots? Spahn’s challenge to Steinmeier exposes deep ideological rifts.

This is a book. On the book we can see the painting of the people and text.
This is a book. On the book we can see the painting of the people and text.

CDU’s Spahn clashes with Steinmeier over potential AfD party ban in Germany

A political debate has erupted over the potential banning of the far-right AfD party in Germany. Jens Spahn, a senior CDU politico, criticised Federal President Frank-Walter Steinmeier for referencing former Chancellor Konrad Adenauer in support of such a move. Spahn argued that the historical context today is fundamentally different from Adenauer’s era.

The dispute began when Steinmeier cited Adenauer’s decision to ban the neo-Nazi Sozialistische Reichspartei (SRP) in 1952. Under Article 21 of Germany’s Basic Law, parties that threaten democracy or the state’s existence can be outlawed—but only the Federal Constitutional Court can make such a ruling.

Spahn countered that Adenauer’s approach was not about bans but about political engagement. He quoted Adenauer’s own words—'Take people as they are; there are no others'—as proof that the CDU’s strategy should focus on addressing grievances rather than exclusion. Spahn also stressed that Adenauer’s CDU could never align with a party like the AfD. In January 2023, Spahn had previously invoked another CDU icon, Ludwig Erhard, to reinforce the party’s economic stance amid tensions with the SPD over welfare reforms. Now, he insists that combating extremism requires tackling its root causes, not just legal measures. While Spahn acknowledges some parallels between past and present threats, he argues the challenges today are only 'partially comparable'. His position reflects a broader CDU debate on how to handle the rise of the AfD without resorting to outright bans.

The exchange highlights deep divisions over how to counter political extremism in Germany. Spahn’s stance favours voter outreach and policy solutions over legal action. For now, any decision on the AfD’s future rests with the Federal Constitutional Court.

Read also:

Latest