Skip to content

Controversial Habeck Documentary Raises Questions Over €275,000 in Public Funding

When a filmmaker with deep ties to Germany’s cultural elite lands €275,000 for a political documentary, is it art—or favoritism? The jury’s independence is now under the microscope.

In this image there is a conference in which there are people sitting in chair and listening to the...
In this image there is a conference in which there are people sitting in chair and listening to the people who are on the stage. It seems like an event in which there is a conversation between the media people and the owners. At the background there is a big hoarding and the wall beside it.

Controversial Habeck Documentary Raises Questions Over €275,000 in Public Funding

A documentary about Germany's Vice-Chancellor Robert Habeck, titled 'Now. Where To.', has sparked controversy due to its funding. The Film and Media Foundation of North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW) awarded €75,000 to the project, with an additional €200,000 coming from federal grants. The producer, Christoph Friedel, has benefited from over €13 million in funding since 2010, raising questions about potential conflicts of interest.

The documentary is directed by Lars Jessen, a long-time friend of Robert Habeck. The political oversight of the Film- and Media Fund of NRW is overseen by Ina Brandes, the Minister of Culture and Science of NRW. However, the awareness and assessment of funding practices by Media Minister Nathanael Liminski remain unclear.

Christoph Friedel, the producer, is in a relationship with Christina Bentlage, who heads the foundation's funding department. Despite this relationship, the foundation has awarded more than 20 funding decisions to Friedel's projects. The foundation maintains that its selection process involves an independent jury, but the jury's independence is not clear.

The Film and Media Foundation of North Rhine-Westphalia has awarded significant funding to a documentary about Robert Habeck, produced by Christoph Friedel, who has received substantial funding over the years. While the foundation maintains an independent jury process, questions remain about potential conflicts of interest and the transparency of the funding process.

Read also:

Latest