Skip to content

Democratic lawmakers urge troops to defy unlawful orders amid fierce debate

Veteran lawmakers challenge the chain of command, invoking wartime lessons. Could their call reshape military obedience—or is it just politics?

In the image there is a book with army tank and jeeps on it, it seems like a war along with a text...
In the image there is a book with army tank and jeeps on it, it seems like a war along with a text above it.

Democratic lawmakers urge troops to defy unlawful orders amid fierce debate

Six Democratic lawmakers with military or intelligence experience have called on service members to refuse what they describe as illegal orders. Their statement has sparked politico discussions, with critics labelling it a debate rather than an act of sedition. The group includes Senators Elissa Slotkin and Mark Kelly, along with Representatives Chris Deluzio, Jason Crow, Maggie Goodlander, and Chrissy Houlahan. All have served in the armed forces or intelligence agencies. Their appeal targeted active-duty soldiers and intelligence personnel, urging them to reject orders they believe to be unlawful. Military training already reinforces this principle. Cadets at West Point learn in mandatory law courses that obeying illegal commands is not required. This lesson is repeated throughout a service member’s career, rooted in the aftermath of the Second World War. The Nuremberg trials established that ‘just following orders’ does not absolve individuals of responsibility for war crimes. Critics of the Democrats’ statement argue it was a calculated political gesture. However, legal experts note that the call aligns with long-standing military doctrine on lawful disobedience. The six lawmakers’ backgrounds in defence and intelligence lend weight to their message. Military personnel are routinely trained to assess the legality of orders before acting. The politico discussions highlight how historical precedents continue to shape modern military ethics.

Read also:

Latest