EU’s costly dual-seat system traps MEPs in a monthly travel nightmare
The European Parliament’s dual seat system continues to face criticism from MEPs and officials. Monthly trips between Brussels and Strasbourg are widely seen as costly and inconvenient. Yet, changing the arrangement remains nearly impossible due to legal hurdles. Most MEPs own apartments in Brussels and must relocate to Strasbourg for monthly sessions. They are allowed only one staff member to accompany them, adding to the logistical strain. Many find the travel disruptive, except for those living near the French-German border. Vice President Katarina Barley has openly criticised the dual-seat setup. She argues that it wastes time, money, and resources. However, the arrangement is protected by EU treaties, which require unanimous approval for any amendments. France holds veto power over treaty changes and has consistently opposed ending Strasbourg’s role. This makes reform highly unlikely, despite growing frustration among lawmakers. The current system forces MEPs to split their work between two cities each month. Without treaty reform, the costly and unpopular arrangement will remain in place. Legal and political barriers ensure no changes are on the horizon.
Read also:
- American teenagers taking up farming roles previously filled by immigrants, a concept revisited from 1965's labor market shift.
- Weekly affairs in the German Federal Parliament (Bundestag)
- Landslide claims seven lives, injures six individuals while they work to restore a water channel in the northern region of Pakistan
- Escalating conflict in Sudan has prompted the United Nations to announce a critical gender crisis, highlighting the disproportionate impact of the ongoing violence on women and girls.
