Germany Cautiously Backs Ukraine’s Wartime Election Plan—With Conditions

Could Ukraine hold elections in 90 days—even at war? Germany’s guarded response reveals the high stakes of democracy under fire. Kyiv’s move, Berlin’s conditions.

, and Administrator

2025 December 10 . 9:30 PM

1 min read

In the picture I can see a news article. In this article I can see photos of buildings, fire,... — In the picture I can see a news article. In this article I can see photos of buildings, fire, smoke, the sky and some other things. I can also see something written on the article.

Germany Cautiously Backs Ukraine’s Wartime Election Plan—With Conditions

The German government has responded to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s proposal for elections within 60 to 90 days, despite ongoing martial law. Officials stressed that any election must depend on strong security guarantees to ensure safety during the war. Berlin has made clear that the final decision lies entirely with Ukraine.

President Zelensky recently stated that elections could take place in Ukraine within two to three months, even under martial law. However, he insisted on two key conditions: security assurances from the US and Europe, and a legal framework allowing wartime elections. The German government acknowledged these demands as necessary for a credible process.

Berlin has repeatedly emphasised that elections should only proceed if a safe environment can be guaranteed. Officials noted that Ukraine’s call for trust and stability before any election aligns with this position. At the same time, they underscored that Ukraine must decide independently on timing and next steps.

The German stance reflects a balance between supporting Ukraine’s democratic process and recognising the challenges of holding elections amid conflict. While open to the idea, authorities have avoided pressuring Kyiv, leaving the choice firmly in Ukrainian hands.

For now, the German government continues to monitor the situation closely. Any election in Ukraine would require both security assurances and a legal basis to proceed. The final decision, however, remains with Kyiv alone.