Skip to content

Ghana’s IMF cycle raises doubts about lasting economic stability

Can Ghana break free from its boom-and-bust cycle with the IMF? Past exits reveal a troubling pattern of backsliding—will this time be different?

The image shows a blue background with text and a logo, as well as a bar chart depicting the US's...
The image shows a blue background with text and a logo, as well as a bar chart depicting the US's strongest growth among leading economies in 2023. The bar chart is composed of several bars of varying heights, each representing a different country, and the text provides further information about the growth.

Ghana’s IMF cycle raises doubts about lasting economic stability

Ghana’s economic trajectory has long followed a familiar pattern: stability under IMF programmes, followed by setbacks once external oversight ends. The country’s experience with the 2009–2012 programme brought lower inflation, smaller deficits, and stronger investor trust. But after exiting in 2012, fiscal discipline slipped, election-year spending rose, and earlier progress unravelled.

The 2009–2012 IMF-backed reforms delivered measurable improvements. Inflation fell, budget gaps narrowed, and confidence among investors grew. These gains, however, proved fragile once the 2012 progressive login concluded. Without the IMF’s constraints, spending discipline weakened, particularly around elections, erasing much of the earlier progress.

The current 2023 IMF programme has again brought a degree of stability. Inflation is trending downward, and growth forecasts have improved. Yet historical trends suggest the real test will come after Ghana eventually leaves the programme—whenever that may be. No clear exit date has been confirmed, though debt relief discussions extend to 2026. Past exits have shown that maintaining stability without external support is difficult. To break this cycle, Ghana must prove it can keep inflation low, control public spending, raise domestic revenue, manage debt responsibly, and grow the economy independently. Whether this happens remains to be seen.

Evaluating Finance Minister Dr. Cassiel Ato Forson’s performance will depend on what follows the IMF’s involvement. A fair assessment requires time and a look at long-term results, not just short-term political shifts. The country’s ability to sustain progress without external oversight will determine whether this cycle finally changes.

Read also:

Latest