Skip to content

Influencer booked for defamation after video targeting Indore MP Shankar Lalwani

A viral video criticizing an MP lands an influencer in legal hot water. Police seize his phone as defamation charges loom—what happens next?

The image shows a large group of people standing around a pond in the middle of a city, surrounded...
The image shows a large group of people standing around a pond in the middle of a city, surrounded by trees, vehicles on the road, and buildings with windows. The sky is visible in the background, and the people are gathered together to protest against the government's decision to ban the use of water in the city.

Influencer booked for defamation after video targeting Indore MP Shankar Lalwani

A social media influencer from Uttar Pradesh is facing legal trouble after posting a video about an MP. Jatin Shukla was summoned by Indore police following a complaint over his remarks about Shankar Lalwani. An FIR was filed against him under charges of intimidation, defamation, and public mischief.

The case began when Shukla uploaded a video criticising MP Shankar Lalwani over contaminated water in Indore's Bhagirathpura area. He allegedly used derogatory language and made defamatory claims. A representative of Lalwani then filed a formal complaint, prompting police action.

On March 13, 2026, Indore police registered an FIR against Shukla under sections 351, 356, and 353 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The charges include criminal intimidation, defamation, and public mischief. Authorities summoned Shukla for questioning, and he appeared before the Crime Branch. During his statement, Shukla claimed his remarks were unintentional and offered an apology. Despite this, officers seized his mobile phone for forensic analysis. He was later released on notice while the investigation into digital evidence continues.

The probe remains ongoing as police examine Shukla's video and digital records. His apology did not prevent the seizure of his phone, and further legal steps may follow. The case highlights the potential consequences of online statements about public figures.

Read also:

Latest