Skip to content

Kazakhstan Considers Proportional Representation for New Parliament

Could a European-style voting system reshape Kazakhstan's democracy? Critics and supporters clash over the future of parliamentary elections.

The image shows an old map of the Asian political system, with text at the top and bottom of the...
The image shows an old map of the Asian political system, with text at the top and bottom of the image. The map is filled with intricate details, showing the various countries and regions of the region. The colors used are mostly shades of blue, green, and yellow, with some hints of red and orange. The text is written in a bold font and is surrounded by a thin black border.

Kazakhstan Considers Proportional Representation for New Parliament

A new proposal for electing Kazakhstan's parliament has drawn both interest and debate. Aidos Sarym, a member of the Constitutional Commission, presented plans for a proportional representation system at its fifth meeting. The suggested model would replace the current electoral method with a single nationwide constituency for the Kurultai, the proposed new parliament.

Sarym explained that the Kurultai would be chosen through a pure party-list proportional system. This approach is already used in many countries, including Belgium, Spain, Finland, and Argentina. Across Europe, nations like the Netherlands, Sweden, and Portugal rely on similar systems for their parliaments, while Germany uses a mixed model.

Outside Europe, countries such as South Africa, Brazil, Chile, and Indonesia also elect their legislatures this way. The system assigns seats based on the percentage of votes each party receives, ensuring representation reflects voter preferences.

Critics argue that proportional representation could weaken local ties or limit individual candidates. Sarym dismissed claims that the system disenfranchises citizens by preventing them from standing for election. Instead, they highlighted its benefits: greater fairness, inclusivity, and clearer ideological choices for voters. The model may also encourage multi-party competition and increase voter turnout.

Despite these arguments, the proposal has faced misinterpretation and debate. Supporters believe it could lead to a more stable and representative political system, while opponents question its practical effects on governance.

The Constitutional Commission continues to review the proposed changes. If adopted, the new system would mark a significant shift in how Kazakhstan elects its parliament. The outcome will determine whether the country follows the example of many European and global democracies using proportional representation.

Read also:

Latest