More Heat Than Light On Vande Mataram And SIR In Parliament

Recent debates in India’s parliament have taken a combative turn, with discussions on electoral reforms and the Vande Mataram song descending into accusations rather than constructive dialogue. Instead of reasoned arguments, lawmakers exchanged charges, turning what should have been a chance for meaningful reform into a spectacle of division.

The debate on electoral reforms was meant to address growing concerns about the integrity of India’s election process. Public trust in the Election Commission has fallen sharply due to reports of malpractices, including issues raised by the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. Yet, rather than examining these problems, the discussion became a platform for blame and counter-blame.

The controversy over *Vande Mataram* followed a similar pattern. Accusations were levelled at the Congress and Nehru for allegedly fragmenting the song, a claim critics called prejudiced and politically motivated. Many saw the debate as an attempt to stir controversy ahead of upcoming elections rather than a genuine discussion on national identity. Parliament, in theory, should be a space for deep public debate—where policies are examined, expert views are weighed, and common ground is found. But recent sessions have replaced reasoned discussion with noise, drama, and a majoritarian approach. When persuasive arguments give way to spectacle, the institution risks becoming just another arena for electioneering.

The missed opportunity to reform India’s electoral system leaves key issues unresolved. Without substantive debate, public confidence in the election process is unlikely to improve. Meanwhile, the trend of turning parliamentary discussions into polarising exchanges continues unchecked.