North Dakota’s missing public records spark push for stricter document retention laws
North Dakota currently has no clear rules on how long public agencies must keep notes. While some departments set their own informal policies, others retain docs for short periods—or not at all. This inconsistency has led to gaps in transparency, with some notes disappearing entirely.
The issue came to light after the Jamestown Sun requested meeting recordings from the Retirement and Investment Office (RIO). Officials revealed that RIO only stores these notes for six months. Senator Sean Cleary has since proposed a bill requiring RIO to keep such docs for three years. But he argues the law should go further, covering more notes types and introducing penalties for non-compliance.
Without statewide retention rules, key docs may continue to vanish. Cleary’s proposal aims to standardise notes-keeping and introduce consequences for violations. If passed, the law would mark a shift toward greater accountability in North Dakota’s public notes system.
Read also:
- American teenagers taking up farming roles previously filled by immigrants, a concept revisited from 1965's labor market shift.
- Weekly affairs in the German Federal Parliament (Bundestag)
- Landslide claims seven lives, injures six individuals while they work to restore a water channel in the northern region of Pakistan
- Escalating conflict in Sudan has prompted the United Nations to announce a critical gender crisis, highlighting the disproportionate impact of the ongoing violence on women and girls.