Opponents of the proposed Constellation-Calpine agreement appeal to FERC to reject the deal.

Opponents of the proposed Constellation-Calpine agreement appeal to FERC to reject the deal.

In the energy sector, the proposed acquisition of Calpine by Constellation Energy is causing a stir, with regulators and consumer advocates expressing concerns about the potential impact on competition, grid reliability, and electricity prices in the PJM Interconnection's market.

The Pennsylvania Office of Consumer Advocate has voiced its apprehensions about the impact of the merger, stating that it could potentially harm competition, worsen grid reliability, and increase pollution in the PJM Interconnection's market.

Critics worry that the merger could concentrate market power, enabling Constellation to manipulate prices or exercise undue influence over grid operations, potentially undermining grid reliability. If the deal were to go through, Constellation's retail market share in the PJM region would increase to nearly 40%, raising alarms that such dominance might stifle competition.

The transaction remains subject to final approval from the Department of Justice (DOJ), which is scrutinizing the deal amid heightened antitrust enforcement in energy markets. This implies that regulators are actively evaluating whether the acquisition would harm competitive dynamics or consumer interests.

If ownership is allowed, Energy Capital Partners, which owns power plants in PJM, should not be allowed to own any shares of Constellation once the deal is complete, according to Monitoring Analytics, the market monitor for PJM. One of the recommended measures is that Constellation should not sell Calpine’s four power plants to any company that owns more than 3% of the installed capacity in PJM.

The proposed deal, valued at an equity purchase price of $16.4 billion, could potentially raise electricity prices in the PJM Interconnection's market. The merged company, if approved, could potentially increase the number of intermediate and peaker generators it can manipulate for its benefit.

Other stakeholders, including consumer advocates and environmental groups, have additionally flagged concerns about whether the merged entity will prioritize profitability over sustainability goals. However, these concerns are less of a strict antitrust issue and more related to corporate behavior and regulatory commitments.

A related regulatory review at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has seen critics argue that the proposed monitor and settlement offered to mitigate antitrust risks are inadequate, suggesting ongoing debates about the sufficiency of measures to address competitive harms post-merger.

In sum, the fundamental antitrust worries are that the acquisition would consolidate power in a dominant player in the PJM market, reducing competitive pressures, potentially leading to higher prices and lower service quality or reliability. The acquisition is still awaiting final approvals, and these concerns will be central to regulatory deliberations by the DOJ and FERC.

As the regulatory reviews proceed, groups like Public Citizen, PennFuture, and the Clean Air Council have suggested that Constellation should be required to sell all of Calpine’s peaking power plants in PJM. Additionally, concerns have been raised about Constellation's incentive to withdraw its nuclear generation from PJM's markets to sell electricity directly to new data centers.

Constellation is the largest supplier to commercial and industrial customers in Pennsylvania, and Calpine is the fourth largest supplier. The merger could increase Constellation's incentive to exert market power in the PJM Interconnection's market, potentially leading to a significant shift in the energy landscape.

As the regulatory process unfolds, it will be crucial to monitor the proposed remedies and divestitures to address these antitrust concerns and ensure a fair and competitive market for consumers in the PJM Interconnection.

[1] Pennsylvania Office of Consumer Advocate [5] Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)

1. The acquisition of Calpine by Constellation Energy in the science sector of energy is causing a stir, with the Pennsylvania Office of Consumer Advocate expressing concerns about potential impacts on competition, grid reliability, and electricity prices in the PJM Interconnection's market.
2. Concerns about market power concentration and potential price manipulation are at the forefront of critiques directed towards the proposed merger, as the combined company could increase its retail market share in the PJM region to nearly 40%.
3. The deal is still subject to final approval from the Department of Justice (DOJ), and the scrutiny indicates that regulators are closely evaluating its potential impact on competitive dynamics and consumer interests.
4. Energy Capital Partners, which owns power plants in PJM, should not be permitted to own any shares of Constellation post-deal, according to one recommendation, to mitigate concerns about market dominance.
5. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is also reviewing the proposed merger, with critics arguing that the proposed monitor and settlement are insufficient in addressing antitrust risks.
6. It has been suggested that Constellation should be required to sell all of Calpine’s peaking power plants in PJM to encourage competition and maintain a fair market for consumers.
7. Another concern is Constellation's possible incentive to withdraw its nuclear generation from PJM's markets to sell electricity directly to new data centers, potentially shifting the energy landscape.
8. If the deal is allowed, it could potentially lead to higher electricity prices, as the merged company could manipulate more intermediate and peaker generators for its benefit.
9. There are ongoing debates about the sufficiency of measures to address competitive harms post-merger, with environmental groups concerned about the merged entity's potential prioritization of profitability over sustainability goals.
10. Issues related to corporate behavior and regulatory commitments require attention alongside issues related to antitrust law.
11. In the context of climate change, it is necessary to monitor the proposed remedies and divestitures to ensure a fair and competitive market for consumers in the PJM Interconnection.
12. As the renewable energy industry continues to grow, it is essential to prioritize health and wellness in the workplace for those working in this sector, taking into account medical conditions and chronic diseases such as type-2 diabetes and skin conditions.
13. Fitness and exercise, eye-health, and hearing are vital components of health and wellness in the workplace, which should be promoted to ensure employee well-being.
14. In the retail sector, promoting health and wellness can lead to increased employee productivity and lower healthcare costs over time, providing a strong business case for the integration of wellness programs in any organization.
15. To address the various concerns surrounding the acquisition, policymakers must consider the broader implications of the merger on the environment, energy costs, and consumer health, ensuring that regulatory decisions support environmental sustainability, energy affordability, and public welfare.

Read also: