Paulusviertel Debates: Who Should Care for Children and Young People?

A lively debate has erupted in Paulusviertel regarding the care and support of children and young people. Comments range from suggestions on who should bear the responsibility to proposals on how to allocate funds.

One commenter argued that caring for children and young people is primarily the responsibility of their families. They believe that financial support should cease at 18, as individuals become responsible for themselves.

Another commenter suggested taking in refugee children as a solution, while a third proposed taking in children or young people to help them on their way to adulthood. However, another commenter questioned why measures are paid up to 21 or 27 years old, echoing the sentiment that responsibility should shift at 18.

The responsibility for financing and managing the so-called 'educational support measures' in Paulusviertel, which can last up to 27 years, lies with the local municipal education authorities and social services. A commenter argued that these services have become a self-service shop for dubious providers, suggesting a need for reform.

In terms of budget allocation, a commenter suggested saving on an air conditioner in Paulusviertel. However, another commenter argued against saving on HzE, stating it has reasons. A third commenter suggested not saving on children and young people's budget positions, proposing alternatives in administration and cultural promotion.

The debate highlights the complex nature of caring for children and young people, with differing views on responsibility, duration of support, and budget allocation. The local authorities, who bear the responsibility for these measures, will likely consider these views in their future policies.