Pennsylvania Justices Face Backlash Over 'Political' Retention Campaign

Voters question the high cost of TV spots supporting the justices. Critics worry about potential bias and misleading endorsements, threatening the integrity of the judicial system.

, and Administrator

2025 October 30 . 7:06 AM

1 min read

This picture shows few woman seated on the chairs and holding some papers in their hands and they... — This picture shows few woman seated on the chairs and holding some papers in their hands and they wore ID tags on their necks and we see few bottles,glasses and couple of flags on the table and we see a flower vase and the screen on the wall

Pennsylvania Justices Face Backlash Over 'Political' Retention Campaign

Three Pennsylvania Supreme Court justices are facing criticism over their retention campaign, with voters expressing concerns about the cost of their TV spots, perceived bias, and questionable endorsements.

The writer is troubled by the high cost of television spots supporting the justices' retention, suggesting potential political influence. Furthermore, they are concerned about the justices prejudging issues in their campaign, implying a bias that could lead to making law from the bench rather than interpreting cases based on law and facts.

The writer is also critical of the justices' claims of endorsements. The Pennsylvania Bar Association does not make endorsements, yet the justices' TV spot suggests otherwise. Additionally, the justices claim police support, but not from an actual police union, and mention an 'Independent Bar Association' that does not exist. The writer is voting 'no' on the retention of these justices, considering them to be 'political hacks'.

The writer's vote is a direct response to the justices' campaign tactics, which they believe undermine the impartiality and integrity of the judicial system. The writer hopes that voting 'no' will prevent the justices from running for retention and send a message about the importance of judicial independence.