Residents Alarmed by Shopping Pavilion's Location Near St. Petersburg's Narva Metro Station

Residents fear the pavilion could block evacuation routes. Despite opposition, the contract was signed, raising questions about emergency access and planning processes.

, and Administrator

2025 October 25 . 6:07 AM

1 min read

In this picture, we see many people are standing. In the middle of the picture, we see many people... — In this picture, we see many people are standing. In the middle of the picture, we see many people are on the staircase. Beside them, we see the stair railing. On the left side, we see a pillar and people are standing beside that. Beside that, we see a wall on which posters are pasted. Beside that, we see a stall. In the background, we see an escalator and a board in white color with some text written on it. At the top, we see many people are standing. We see a railing. This picture might be clicked in the mall.

Residents Alarmed by Shopping Pavilion's Location Near St. Petersburg's Narva Metro Station

A shopping pavilion's construction near St. Petersburg's Narva Metro Station has sparked concern among residents and sparked a debate about safety and planning procedures. Residents have voiced worries that the pavilion could obstruct evacuation routes in case of an emergency at the metro station. Despite their concerns, the contract for the pavilion's placement was signed before its location was excluded from the scheme for non-stationary commercial facilities (NTO). The identity of the individual who signed the contract remains unknown. The press service of the Committee on Industrial Policy, Innovation and Trade of St. Petersburg confirmed that the pavilion was agreed upon, even though the Kirovsky district administration opposed it. Residents have also complained about the pavilion blocking the stairs leading to the metro station. The pavilion's construction near Narva Metro Station has raised questions about emergency access and planning processes. While the contract was signed, the responsible parties and the reasons behind the decision remain unclear. Residents continue to express their concerns about the potential impact on safety and evacuation routes.