Restoring Truth: A response to the Dormaahene on the National Cathedral debate

Ghana’s National Cathedral project has faced renewed scrutiny after public statements by a prominent traditional leader. Osagyefo Oseadeeyo Dr Nana Freduah Agyemang Badu II, the Dormaahene and President of the Bono Regional House of Chiefs, recently questioned the project’s legality and called for investigations. His claims come despite a statutory audit by Deloitte Ghana finding no evidence of misappropriation, theft, or corruption.

The National Cathedral was launched as an interdenominational Christian project under President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo’s government. Its aim was to foster national unity and spiritual identity. From the start, the initiative has drawn public debate, with critics examining its funding and land acquisition processes.

The Dormaahene’s latest remarks centred on allegations of corruption, though he did not cite specific evidence of wrongdoing. He urged former President John Mahama to push for accountability, mentioning figures between USD $56 million and $97 million without confirming their accuracy. His comments, however, risk spreading misinformation, as official records show all state funds were allocated under approved contracts and publicly disclosed.

In December 2022, the National Cathedral Secretariat submitted full documentation to Parliament for oversight. The Attorney-General’s Department has repeatedly confirmed that all payments complied with Ghanaian law. A Deloitte Ghana audit covering 2021–2023 also found no financial irregularities or unlawful conduct.

The project’s financing has always been transparent, combining state seed funding with voluntary donations. Annual budget statements detail these arrangements, ensuring public access to the records. Despite this, the Dormaahene’s call for prosecution has reignited discussions about the cathedral’s legitimacy.

The National Cathedral remains a contentious issue, with its legal and financial processes repeatedly verified by independent audits. The Dormaahene’s appeal for further investigation contrasts with official findings, which confirm compliance with financial and constitutional rules. For now, the project’s documentation remains open to legislative review, while the judiciary and chieftaincy institutions continue to uphold their respective roles.