Skip to content

Solingen’s homelessness debate heats up over CDU’s strict station underpass bans

A controversial plan to clear homeless people from Solingen’s station underpass divides politicians and activists. Will stricter rules solve anything—or just push the problem out of sight?

In the image there are shelters and under the shelters there are pillars and rooms, around the...
In the image there are shelters and under the shelters there are pillars and rooms, around the shelters there is a grass surface.

Solingen’s homelessness debate heats up over CDU’s strict station underpass bans

A debate over homelessness at Solingen Central Station underpass has intensified after the CDU proposed stricter public order rules. The plan includes banning sitting, camping, and overnight stays in the area. Meanwhile, the Bürgergemeinschaft für Solingen e.V. (BfS) has criticised the approach, calling for broader, long-term solutions instead.

The CDU’s proposal aims to tighten regulations around the station underpass. If passed, the new rules would prohibit people from sitting, camping, or staying overnight at any time. The party also suggested better communication about existing support services for homeless individuals.

The BfS acknowledged that the issue is now on the political agenda but argued that the CDU’s plan falls short. In their response, the group stressed that banning homeless people from the underpass would not solve the problem—it would only move it elsewhere. They pointed out that many support services rely on volunteers and lack proper funding, leaving gaps in care.

Instead of enforcement, the BfS pushed for sustainable, socially responsible measures. They called for stronger state involvement and well-funded support structures that give homeless people real opportunities. The group also highlighted that the main issue is not a lack of awareness about help but the inadequacy of the services themselves.

The CDU’s proposal focuses on stricter bans and clearer information about support options. The BfS, however, insists that lasting change requires more than displacement and enforcement. Their alternative emphasises state-backed, long-term solutions to ensure public spaces remain inclusive while providing meaningful help for those in need.

Read also:

Latest