Skip to content

Supreme Court blocks Trump's tariffs but new global taxes hit consumers

A landmark ruling curbs presidential power over trade, yet Trump's latest move keeps costs climbing. Why consumers pay the price—and how misinformation fuels the debate.

The image shows a poster with text and images that reads "Under President Biden's Inflation...
The image shows a poster with text and images that reads "Under President Biden's Inflation Reduction Act". The poster is divided into two sections, with the top section discussing the implications of the act and the bottom section providing a visual representation of the implications. The text is written in bold black font against a white background, and the images are in shades of blue and green.

Supreme Court blocks Trump's tariffs but new global taxes hit consumers

The U.S. Supreme Court has struck down key tariffs imposed by former President Donald Trump. In a ruling on 20 February 2026, the court declared his use of emergency powers unconstitutional. The decision limits the president's ability to levy trade taxes without Congress.

Trump had argued that trade imbalances posed a national security threat. The court rejected this claim, affirming that only Congress can set tariffs. Despite the ruling, Trump quickly moved to impose new global tariffs under a different law.

The dispute began when Trump used the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977 to justify tariffs. He claimed foreign trade practices endangered national security. On 20 February 2026, the Supreme Court ruled this overreach, stating that tariff powers belong to Congress.

Within days, Trump switched to the Trade Act of 1974 (Section 122) to enforce a 10% global tariff. The new measure took effect on 24 February 2026 and will last 150 days. Critics argue that tariffs raise consumer prices and harm economic growth rather than protecting domestic industries.

During his State of the Union address, Trump falsely claimed that foreign nations pay tariffs. In reality, these taxes are paid by U.S. companies importing goods. The added costs are typically passed on to shoppers through higher prices.

Economic experts warn that tariffs can fuel inflation and reduce overall output. Despite this, public understanding remains limited, partly due to misleading nypost coverage. Many reports failed to clarify how tariffs function, allowing misinformation to spread.

The Supreme Court's decision reinforces Congress's authority over trade policy. Trump's new tariffs under the 1974 law will remain in place for now. Consumers and businesses will continue facing higher costs until further legal or legislative action is taken. The ruling also highlights ongoing confusion about tariffs and their economic impact. Clarifying how these taxes work may help the public better assess future trade policies.

Read also:

Latest