Tech Reluctance in Air Travel: Exploring the Reasons for the Sector's Aversion to Innovation
In the realm of aviation, change doesn't come easily. From remote and digital towers to advanced unmanned systems, new technologies often face resistance due to concerns about safety, reliability, and traditional practices.
The first remote tower system was introduced at Sweden's Örnskoldsvik Airport in 2014, marking a significant step towards digitalisation. However, the initial acceptance was met with scepticism, as many questioned the impact on situation awareness and the system's overall reliability. Regulators, starting with those overseeing low-traffic airports, approved these systems gradually, recognising their potential to reduce costs and improve visibility.
Another technology that faced initial resistance was Electronic Flight Bags (EFBs), which replaced heavy paper manuals with tablets. Concerns about distraction, reliability, and battery life were prevalent, but regulators addressed these issues by limiting and defining the scope of EFB use.
ADS-B Out, a new technology in aviation, was resisted by many operators due to high installation costs, downtime, and limited perceived benefit. However, mandates and transition flexibility eventually led to its widespread adoption. For more information on ADS-B requirements and equipage, visit the FAA's official guidance at FAA.gov.
Reducing cockpit crews with the help of AI and ground support is currently one of the most debated ideas in aviation. However, technology resistance in this industry is deeply rooted in its safety culture, and every innovation must earn its place to ensure safety first. Gradual rollouts of new technology, testing at smaller scales before widespread adoption, help build confidence in the industry.
Resistance to new technologies serves as a protective mechanism, forcing manufacturers, airlines, and regulators to produce strong evidence before they are widely used to avoid unintended safety hazards. Supporting operators with funding, tools, or transition programs is important for managing the adoption of new technology.
Prioritising human factors in the design of new systems is essential to support, not overwhelm, pilots and controllers. Ensuring crews are confident and competent with new technology through training is crucial for successful implementation. Defining the limits of new technology, including what it can and cannot do, is important for building trust in the industry. Limiting and defining the scope of new tools makes them safer and easier to trust in aviation.
Recently, EASA and other regulators have paused parts of the project studying single-pilot and AI-assisted operations, citing concerns about fatigue, incapacitation, and trust in AI systems. This pause underscores the importance of thorough testing and consideration before implementing new technologies in the aviation industry.
In most industries, technology resistance comes from cost or convenience. But in aviation, it often comes from safety concerns, trust issues, costs and downtime, and tradition and procedures. Despite these challenges, the aviation industry continues to push boundaries, striving to integrate modern technologies while maintaining the highest safety standards.
Read also:
- Federal Funding Supports Increase in Family Medicine Residency Program, Focusing on Rural Health Developments
- Potential Role of DHA in Shielding the Brain from Saturated Fats?
- Alternative Gentle Retinoid: Exploring Bakuchiol Salicylate for Sensitive Skin
- Hanoi initiates a trial program for rabies control, along with efforts to facilitate the transition from the dog and cat meat trade industry.
