Skip to content

Vicious cat killer given suspended sentence, animal rights groups outraged

A district court sentenced a man to a suspended prison term for killing a stray cat by trapping it in a rubber traffic cone, stomping it to death and setting it on fire, court officials said Wednesday.

There is a cat in black and white color combination sitting near a plant and green color fencing....
There is a cat in black and white color combination sitting near a plant and green color fencing. Outside this fencing, there are plants and grass on the ground.

Vicious cat killer given suspended sentence, animal rights groups outraged

A man has been sentenced for killing a stray cat in a violent attack that shocked animal welfare groups. The incident took place late at night in Incheon, where the animal was trapped, stomped on, and set alight. The court handed down a suspended prison term along with community service and education requirements.

The crime occurred at around 11:53 p.m. on June 27 in Sinheung-dong, Jung District. The man admitted to trapping the cat in a rubber traffic cone before stomping it to death and setting its body on fire. He later expressed remorse in court and had no prior criminal record beyond minor fines.

Under South Korea’s Animal Protection Act, the man received a six-month prison sentence, suspended for two years. The judge also ordered him to complete 80 hours of community service and attend 40 hours of lectures on preventing animal cruelty. New sentencing guidelines suggest prison terms of four months to one year or fines of 3 million to 12 million won for such offences. Animal rights activists criticised the ruling as too lenient for the brutality involved. They argued that the punishment did not reflect the severity of the crime. Courts can impose harsher penalties—up to two years in prison or fines of 20 million won—in cases involving extreme cruelty or multiple aggravating factors.

The suspended sentence means the man will avoid jail unless he commits another offence within two years. He must still fulfil the community service and educational requirements set by the court. The case has reignited debates over whether current penalties for animal abuse are strong enough to act as a deterrent.

Read also:

Latest