Zurich’s heated debate over forcing businesses to accept cash payments

One party calls it a fight for equality; others see it as outdated. Zurich’s cash payment battle exposes deep divides over money, privacy, and power.

, and Administrator

2025 November 20 . 11:10 PM

1 min read

In the foreground of the picture there is payment and a bus. On the left there are buildings,... — In the foreground of the picture there is payment and a bus. On the left there are buildings, pavement, hoardings, people and road. It is sunny.

Zurich’s heated debate over forcing businesses to accept cash payments

A political debate over cash payments has erupted in Zurich after the Alternative List (AL) party proposed a motion to make them mandatory for businesses. The move comes after public frustration with venues like the Kunsthaus art museum and the Christmas market, which initially refused cash transactions. Now, rival parties have weighed in with their own proposals on the issue.

The AL’s motion argues that banning cash discriminates against people without bank accounts. It also warns against 'surveillance capitalism', claiming cash protects privacy and ensures equal economic participation. If passed, the rule would force municipal businesses and those on public land to accept cash.

Two politicians, Michael Töngi and Oliver Mauch, have submitted a counter-motion opposing the AL’s plan. Meanwhile, the Swiss People’s Party (SVP) and the Free Democratic Party (FDP) have put forward their own motions on cash payments in Zurich. The dispute reflects wider concerns about financial inclusion and consumer choice in the city.

The outcome of these motions will decide whether Zurich enforces cash acceptance for certain businesses. The debate highlights tensions between modern payment trends and the need to protect vulnerable groups. A decision is expected in the coming months.