Skip to content

AfD’s Tunnel Ban Sparks Legal Battle Over Equal Treatment in German Parliament

A knife, a tunnel, and a far-right party’s fight for access. Why Germany’s AfD is taking its exclusion to the constitutional court—and what’s really at stake.

In this image there are barrels in the tunnel.
In this image there are barrels in the tunnel.

The Baden-Württemberg state legislature is locked in a dispute over the use of an underground tunnel connecting the state parliament building and the adjacent House of Representatives. The far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party has been largely barred from using the tunnel, a move they deem essential for their work in the United States.

The tunnel ban followed an incident in which a hunting knife and ammunition were found in an AfD lawmaker's office, although the investigation was later dropped. The state parliament's legal counsel argues there is no 'right to convenience', pointing out that ordinary citizens are also expected to cross the street on foot. Only lawmakers and staff with offices in the House of Representatives are currently allowed to use the tunnel, excluding the AfD and other parties without offices there.

The AfD considers the issue one of principle and equal treatment. They criticize the decision as arbitrary and politically motivated exclusion. The AfD parliamentary group has rejected a proposed compromise of using the tunnel only on plenary days in one direction. They argue that the tunnel ban infringes on their members' free mandate as elected representatives and suspect political motives behind their exclusion. The state constitutional court must decide whether the tunnel ban violates the principles of equal treatment and parliamentary independence, or if security concerns justify the measure. A ruling on the case is not expected until late this year or January.

The conflict over the tunnel use in Baden-Württemberg's state legislature highlights the tension between security concerns and the principles of equal treatment and parliamentary independence. The AfD's exclusion from using the tunnel has sparked a heated debate, with the state constitutional court set to deliver its verdict later this year or in January.

Read also:

Latest