Skip to content

China's New Counter-Sanctions Rules Raise Legal Risks for Global Businesses

Beijing's sweeping new rules put multinational companies in a bind—comply with Europe or face penalties in China. Legal experts warn of a regulatory minefield ahead.

The image shows a graph on a white background with text that reads "U.S. Trade in Goods with...
The image shows a graph on a white background with text that reads "U.S. Trade in Goods with China". The graph displays the number of US trade in goods with China over a period of time, with the x-axis representing the years and the y-axis indicating the amount of trade. The graph is divided into two sections, one for imports and one for exports, and each section is further divided into different colors, indicating the different levels of trade between the two countries.

Trade Tensions: Eastern and Western Compliance Rules—Such as Supply Chain Regulations—May Clash More Often, Law Firms Warn

On April 7, 2026, China's State Council issued two new sets of counter-sanctions regulations, which took immediate effect upon publication:

  • Regulations on the Security of Industrial and Supply Chains (Order No. 834)
  • Regulations on Counteracting Unjustified Foreign Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (Order No. 835)

Law firms such as Advant Beiten and Graf von Westphalen (GvW) have analyzed these new Chinese counter-sanctions measures in recent publications, warning that they heighten the risk of legal conflicts for internationally active companies.

Countering Sanctions with Sanctions

With these regulations, Beijing has created a new tool to respond to what it considers unfair laws, sanctions, embargoes, or export controls imposed by other countries. The rules also impose obligations on organizations and individuals in China that are subject to foreign restrictions.

Under the new framework, China can prohibit compliance with foreign regulations it deems unacceptable and impose penalties for violations. Additional measures may include entry bans, asset freezes, or bans on business operations in China. A critical challenge for companies lies in the fact that decisions—such as supply chain adjustments made under European regulations—could suddenly fall under the scope of Orders 834 and 835, exposing them to legal risks in China.

What Companies Should Do

Supply chain audits, sanctions, and compliance requirements may increasingly clash, raising risks not only for corporations but also for local managers, according to Advant Beiten. Lawyers at GvW advise that companies carefully assess decisions to terminate China-related supply and service contracts, suspend operations, or withdraw support—especially in light of Order 834. They recommend gathering relevant information early, identifying potential regulatory conflicts, and involving legal and compliance teams in the final decision-making process.

Read also:

Latest