Skip to content
Politics — Navigating Air Safety Regulations

Portugal's leaders clash over pension cuts and government spending priorities

A bitter feud erupts as fact-checkers confirm dire pension forecasts. Will flashy projects save Portugal's future—or deepen the crisis?

,   and  Administrator
2 min read
The image shows a blue background with a building in the center and text that reads "Under...
The image shows a blue background with a building in the center and text that reads "Under Bidenomics, the unemployment rate has stayed below 4% for 21 months in a row. That's the longest stretch in over 50 years."

Mariana Leitão Accuses Prime Minister of Chasing Headlines Without a Solid Plan

Portugal's leaders clash over pension cuts and government spending priorities

During the biweekly parliamentary debate, Mariana Leitão, leader of the Iniciativa Liberal (IL), accused Prime Minister Luís Montenegro of prioritizing "headline-grabbing" over substance—what she described as superficial media attention without a concrete, robust plan, contrary to Montenegro's claims.

Amid billions in proposed funding—much of which remains uncertain in actual value—Montenegro defended his government's decisions by invoking the "law of democracy." Undeterred, Leitão pressed further.

"What were the criteria for including projects in the Recovery and Resilience Plan (PTRR)?" she challenged. Montenegro responded by citing the University of Leiria as an example, asserting it would "undoubtedly strengthen national cohesion and boost the economy."

Leitão, shaking her head with a skeptical smile, countered that the project "was already planned" before being folded into the PTRR. With no time left to press Montenegro for details, she shifted to pensions.

Noting that both the far-right Chega party and the Socialist Party (PS) had raised proposals to increase pensions and lower the retirement age, Leitão issued a stark warning: "Given the sustainability of Social Security, someone who is 35 today and retires at 70 will receive a first pension worth just 40% of their final salary."

Is that true?

The argument isn't new—it's a recurring liberal talking point. Back in 2025, broadcaster SIC had already fact-checked a similar claim, originally made by then-IL leader Rui Rocha, who stated that "a 30-year-old today could face a 60% drop in income upon retirement compared to their last salary"—meaning their pension would amount to just 40% of their final wage.

At the time, the claim held up. Analysts from the European Commission confirmed that someone retiring in 2026 would indeed see their pension slashed by nearly 60%—leaving them with just 40% of their last salary. In practical terms, a 30-year-old earning €1,000 a month throughout their career would receive a first pension of just €400.

Little has changed since then. The 2024 Ageing Report—the latest edition, which includes a Portugal-specific analysis and served as Rocha's source—projects that by 2050, the average pension will plummet from around 90% of final salary (for those retiring in 2045) to less than 40%—specifically 38.5%.

For a 35-year-old today retiring at 70 in 2061, the pension would equate to 40.1% of their final salary—validating Leitão's claim. The outlook is even bleaker for a 25-year-old retiring in 2070, whose pension would drop to 38.9% of their last wage.

However, these figures are estimates, as pensions depend on years of contributions, age, and individual circumstances. They also assume no reforms to Social Security over the next 35 years.

SIC Verifica concludes: Mariana Leitão's warning about the unsustainability of Social Security is accurate. According to European Commission data, a 35-year-old today retiring at 70 can expect a pension worth just 40% of their final salary. The claim is true.

Read also:

Related

Latest