Skip to content

EU's controversial asylum overhaul could send rejected applicants to third-country hubs

A radical shift in EU asylum policy could outsource claims to external hubs—but will vulnerable groups pay the price? Critics question the ethics of deportation centers.

The image shows a graph depicting the number of individuals granted asylum in the United States...
The image shows a graph depicting the number of individuals granted asylum in the United States from 1990 to 2016. The graph is accompanied by text that provides further information about the data.

EU's controversial asylum overhaul could send rejected applicants to third-country hubs

Stuttgart – Cem Özdemir, the Green Party's lead candidate in Baden-Württemberg, has voiced support for processing asylum claims in safe third countries.

"If there is a third country where the rule of law is upheld in asylum procedures—under the guidance of the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR)—then this is an option that promises greater humanity," Özdemir told the news portal T-Online. He argued that the current asylum system favors the strong, disproportionately disadvantaging women and children, who are particularly vulnerable.

At the end of last year, the European Union laid the groundwork to more easily transfer people to so-called safe third countries outside the EU. This would allow asylum procedures to be conducted in nations where applicants have no prior connection. The plans still require approval from the European Parliament. The new rules would also simplify the establishment of "return hubs" in third countries for rejected asylum seekers—a measure Özdemir opposes.

Read also:

Latest