Skip to content

FCC's aggressive scrutiny of ABC sparks accusations of political bias and censorship

A defamation settlement with Trump may have triggered the FCC's crackdown. Now, ABC warns of a dangerous precedent for free speech in media.

The image shows a newspaper with the word "discussion" written on it. The paper is yellowed with...
The image shows a newspaper with the word "discussion" written on it. The paper is yellowed with age, and the text is written in black ink. The headline reads "Semanario Repúblicano Democrático Federal". The paper appears to be slightly crumpled, suggesting it has been handled multiple times.

FCC's aggressive scrutiny of ABC sparks accusations of political bias and censorship

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has intensified scrutiny of Disney-owned ABC, raising concerns over political bias in regulatory actions. The agency recently ordered ABC’s stations to file for early licence renewal—a move critics call unusual and potentially politically driven. At the same time, the FCC revived a long-standing complaint about ABC’s handling of a presidential debate, sparking accusations of censorship.

The dispute follows a $16 million defamation settlement between Disney/ABC and Donald Trump in December 2024, which some believe emboldened the FCC’s actions. Democratic Commissioner Anna Gomez has accused the agency of a 'coordinated campaign of censorship and control' against the network.

The conflict began when the Center for American Rights filed a complaint over ABC’s moderation of a presidential debate. Soon after, FCC Chairman Brendan Carr—a Trump appointee—reopened the case and launched a separate investigation into Disney’s diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) practices. Gomez has argued that such investigations are often pursued selectively against media outlets seen as critical of the current administration.

The FCC also issued new guidance on the equal time rule, which requires broadcasters to offer comparable airtime to political rivals if requested. ABC has pushed back, claiming it is being unfairly singled out while other networks face no similar action. The network warned that regulating viewpoints on programmes like *The View* could set a dangerous precedent, allowing the government to dictate which perspectives are allowed. Gomez further criticised the early licence renewal order as an unusual step, suggesting it was politically motivated. She claimed the FCC’s actions are rarely resolved in court, avoiding judicial review. Meanwhile, an FCC spokesperson defended the equal time rule, stating it encourages broader political discourse and empowers voters. Critics, including Gomez, have accused Carr of 'weaponising' the FCC’s authority to pressure media outlets. The agency’s focus on ABC has intensified since the network’s settlement with Trump, leading to claims that the FCC is targeting perceived opponents of the administration.

The FCC’s actions have placed ABC under heightened regulatory pressure, with investigations into both its debate moderation and DEI policies. The network has argued that the moves threaten free speech and could allow government interference in media content. The dispute now centres on whether the FCC’s approach is a legitimate enforcement of broadcasting rules—or a politically driven effort to control media narratives.

Read also:

Latest