Skip to content

Germany's Greens push bold tax and pension reforms under Özdemir's plan

A radical overhaul is on the table: earlier tax breaks for businesses, no loopholes for millionaire heirs, and pensions tied to work history. Will Germany embrace the change?

The image shows a poster with the text "Maganomics: An Economic Plan That Does Three Things Cuts...
The image shows a poster with the text "Maganomics: An Economic Plan That Does Three Things Cuts Taxes Even More for the Wealthy and Big Corporations" written in bold, black font against a white background. The poster is framed by a thin black border, giving it a modern and professional look. The text is centered in the middle of the poster, emphasizing its importance.

Özdemir will earlier reduction of corporate tax - instead of expanding parental allowance - Germany's Greens push bold tax and pension reforms under Özdemir's plan

Green Party lead candidate Cem Özdemir, running in Baden-Württemberg's state election, has called for bringing forward the corporate tax cuts currently scheduled for 2028. "I believe it is right to reduce corporate taxes still this year," Özdemir told Handelsblatt in remarks released on Monday. To offset the cost, the Green politician proposed delaying the planned expansion of the "mother's pension" benefit.

"Handing out election gifts at the expense of future generations is not a priority," Özdemir stated. He saw no justification for introducing the mother's pension a year earlier than agreed in the coalition treaty. The federal government's black-red coalition had recently decided to bring forward the measure to 2027. Under current plans, the corporate tax reduction is set to be phased in from 2028 onward, as agreed by the CDU/CSU and SPD.

Özdemir also demanded reforms to inheritance tax, arguing that it was unacceptable for heirs of a €26 million business fortune to potentially pay no tax at all.

On pensions, he advocated for greater flexibility. "Rigid retirement ages are no longer fit for purpose," he said, suggesting that fixed pension eligibility should be abolished altogether. "We should differentiate by occupation and years of contributions," he proposed instead. He also criticized the penalty-free pension after 45 years of contributions—the earlier "pension at 63" scheme.

Read also:

Latest