Skip to content

Hamburg's mock trial debates banning Germany's far-right AfD party

A fictional courtroom puts democracy on trial—five jurors say the AfD's fate belongs in Germany's highest court. Could this spark real change?

The image shows a German propaganda poster for the Nazi Party featuring two men sitting on a couch....
The image shows a German propaganda poster for the Nazi Party featuring two men sitting on a couch. The poster has text written on it, likely providing information about the party.

Hamburg's mock trial debates banning Germany's far-right AfD party

Hamburg's Thalia Theater staged a three-day fictional trial addressing several socially and politically explosive issues. Among the topics debated were two key questions: "Should the AfD be banned?" and "Should social media be banned for everyone under 16?"

The proceedings on the AfD provoked the most intense reactions. Journalist Harald Martenstein—formerly of Die Zeit Magazin and now with Bild—sparked controversy with his divisive statement, in which he spoke out firmly against banning the party. At the close of the trial, a spokesperson for the jury announced that, after weighing all arguments, five of the seven jurors had voted in favor of the motion that an AfD ban "should be examined by the Constitutional Court."

Milo Rau, currently the director of the Vienna Festival (Wiener Festwochen), brought his "Vienna Congress" format to Hamburg under the title "Trial Against Germany." Last year, the Accent Theater in Vienna hosted a similar debate on the Israel-Gaza war, where Welt journalist Ulf Poschardt defended Israel and condemned all critics of the country. In 2024, the focus shifted to a mock trial centered on Austria's far-right FPÖ.

Read also:

Latest